When we say something is fat, it’s
synonymous with our perception that it’s unhealthy. Anything can have too much
fat (overweight) or too little (underweight), both of which impacting their
health.
So yes, hippos, seals and whales all
have a lot of blubber (fat). But this fat is for insulation and buoyancy to aid
their life in the water. For some species, extra blubber lets them withstand
the increased pressure of deep water. (Like a blob fish, but they don’t tend to
be labelled as ‘fat’.)
The less fat/blubber these species
carry, the harder their life is in the water. Thus difficulty prevents them
from flourishing and means they are less likely to successfully reproduce.
Ultimately, unhealthy animals are more likely to be dead. Anything that causes
these poor results can be labelled as ‘unhealthy’.
If calling something ‘fat’ is
calling them unhealthy,
and if hippos, seals and whales need
all their blubber/fat to be healthy,
then calling healthy hippos, seals
and whales ‘fat’ is inaccurate.
Thus these animals are concurrently
fat (because they’re blubbery) and aren’t fat (because they’re healthy). This
inconsistency teaches us an important lesson: equating ‘fat’ with ‘unhealthy’ is clearly inaccurate.
No comments:
Post a Comment