Despite being Jewish, Jesus is
typically depicted as Caucasian.
Understandably
this confuses people. Whilst this depiction of Jesus is popularly thought to be
modelled on Cesare Borgia, this could only happen in the first place because
Christianity was (and is) a missionary religion.
(Jesus had
been shown as white long before Cesare Borgia was alive. Hence people using
Cesare Borgia as the sole reason for white Jesus is faulty to the extreme.)
Missionary religions (including
Buddhism, Islam and the Hare Krishna Movement of Hinduism) seek to spread their
religious beliefs to other ethnic groups aside from their own.
Humans are
social creatures that make bonds based on similarities of identity, from shared
interests to shared ethnicity. People will then start to depict important
religious figures as their own ethnicity to heighten the shared identity. It
helps indigenise the religion to the ethnic group. It’s a process I call
‘ethnic shift’.***
For
example, in regards to ethnic physiological features, fashions and hairstyles,
statues of the Buddha look Chinese in China, Japanese in Japan and Greek in
Gandhara, (the area in Afghanistan where Greeks settled after Alexander the
Great’s failed conquest of India). This is true even though Siddhartha Gautama
(the Buddha) was ethnically Nepalese.
Depictions of Jesus have undergone
the same process.
Aboriginal
Australian and Native American Christians depict Jesus as their own ethnic
groups. Jesus is considered, after all, God become Man: if Jesus looks like you
then God looks like you. God is no longer ‘foreign’.
White
people did the same. As Caucasian men dominated the world and most forms of
Christianity, Jesus will ultimately always be depicted as white to a western
audience.
This had led Christians to
antagonise Jewish and Arab people as the other, to abuse them and to use them
as a scapegoat. This brings up the question: should depictions of Jesus have an
ethnic shift back to His true Jewish ethnicity?
***
Anthropic
depictions of the Prophet Muhammad are forbidden in Islam so this process
couldn’t happen.
There are
photographs of the people Hare Krishnas venerate so for them to undergo an
ethnic shift would be odd.
In
Hinduism, there are strict rules for how a deity should be depicted and murtis
are only worthy (and able to host their deity) if these requirements are met:
for Krishna to become a white Caucasian instead of blue and from Mathura would
be unthinkable.
No comments:
Post a Comment