Been reading a few news articles and they made me think.
One was a beluga that had learned to make human sounds. The story was that someone was in the pool with it, and someone was telling the human to get out, but they didn't know who it was. They then realised that it was the whale. Everyone was astounded. I wonder why. Belugas have often been called 'canaries of the sea', so it really is no surprise that it would mimic the sounds around it. As it lived with humans, human sounds would be the most natural thing for it to mimic.
Also, there was an article about dinosaurs evolving feathers for mating displays rather than flying. Surely this is obvious? Most dinosaurs were fairly large, and the largest birds, such as ostriches and the extinct elephant bird, can't fly and their feathers are used for courtship displays. Also, it seems very unlikely that dinosaurs would evolve to fly and then evolve the feathers to help them.
Finally, people who suffer from schizophrenia and depression are often more creative than non-sufferers. This makes complete sense. In a world where only yourself is certain, or the world outside is so sad, escape via creativity would provide soothing joy.
Saturday, 27 October 2012
Saturday, 11 August 2012
School Sports
Seeing people propose two hours a day for sports aren't sensible.
Two hours a day? No. School is primarily for learning, and two hours of sport means only three hours are left for this purpose. Unless school hours are to be increased, how are children supposed to learn all the information that they need to? I'm not saying that there should be no sports in school, just maybe a limit of two hours a week instead of a minimum of two a day.
Also, there's the declaration to get rid of the 'everyone is a winner' culture. That is not what happens. It's still nice to win, but that isn't what sport is about, because it is about taking part. If sport was just about winning, only those that were really good would enjoy it because only they could fulfil the 'purpose' of the sport, which would decrease the people of sport that would chose to do sport in their own time. That would be utterly counterproductive.
Two hours a day? No. School is primarily for learning, and two hours of sport means only three hours are left for this purpose. Unless school hours are to be increased, how are children supposed to learn all the information that they need to? I'm not saying that there should be no sports in school, just maybe a limit of two hours a week instead of a minimum of two a day.
Also, there's the declaration to get rid of the 'everyone is a winner' culture. That is not what happens. It's still nice to win, but that isn't what sport is about, because it is about taking part. If sport was just about winning, only those that were really good would enjoy it because only they could fulfil the 'purpose' of the sport, which would decrease the people of sport that would chose to do sport in their own time. That would be utterly counterproductive.
Tuesday, 7 August 2012
Argyll and Bute, Scotland
Ten days without a phone signal and Internet, and where the minerals in the water make it the colour of the weakest apple juice. No matter how useful and pleasant technology can be, it's always nice to not have them once in a while.
The mountains were stunning: beautifully untouched by humans. I had always considered the Malvern Hills to be big, hard climb, but seeing the mountains in Scotland made me quite glad that I didn't climb any of them!
We went to the Scottish Sea Life Sanctuary in Oban.
They only had only seal in the Seal Pools, which is really good because it meant the seals they'd been treating were are okay and in the sea!
Annoyingly, someone took a flash picture of the octopus despite the fact that there were three massive signs asking people not to do so. I think it was fine, so hopefully no harm was done!
Saturday, 5 May 2012
How to remember PHOSPHOLIPIDS in Biology
My creation of the merostrich (mer-ostrich) or hydrostrich (hydro-ostrich; water-ostrich) helped myself and my classmates remember the details of phospholipids for out Biology AS Level.
A merostrich lives on the ocean, its legs sticking straight into the air and its head in the water (as a nod to the silly notion that ostriches put their head in the sand).
Hence the merostrich's head is hydrophilic ('water loving' with 'philic' from 'philia' meaning love) and its legs are hydrophobic ('water phobic' as in having a phobia, being intensely afraid of something, NOT hating it).
A phospholipid has a hydrophilic phospate head and some hydrophobic fatty acid tails.
A merostrich lives on the ocean, its legs sticking straight into the air and its head in the water (as a nod to the silly notion that ostriches put their head in the sand).
Hence the merostrich's head is hydrophilic ('water loving' with 'philic' from 'philia' meaning love) and its legs are hydrophobic ('water phobic' as in having a phobia, being intensely afraid of something, NOT hating it).
A phospholipid has a hydrophilic phospate head and some hydrophobic fatty acid tails.
Wednesday, 2 May 2012
AS Levels
Five days until my first exam: Biology. Yuck.
At least this year I only have seven. Only if every subject had coursework like English... which still haven't been given back to us. It's been four (or five) weeks since we gave in our final drafts. I respect that teachers have more than just my year group to worry about, but surely coursework should be prioritised?!?
Waiting to do my GCSEs was bad enough, but this is INTENSE! Each subject has twice as much information in it as a two-year GCSE. It is too much to remember: apparently, instead of taking modules in January, it's better to remember more for longer. Yeh... sensible, not really.
At least when we start A2 after May half term I can drop a subject. That'll be tension gone.
At least this year I only have seven. Only if every subject had coursework like English... which still haven't been given back to us. It's been four (or five) weeks since we gave in our final drafts. I respect that teachers have more than just my year group to worry about, but surely coursework should be prioritised?!?
Waiting to do my GCSEs was bad enough, but this is INTENSE! Each subject has twice as much information in it as a two-year GCSE. It is too much to remember: apparently, instead of taking modules in January, it's better to remember more for longer. Yeh... sensible, not really.
At least when we start A2 after May half term I can drop a subject. That'll be tension gone.
Wednesday, 11 April 2012
Peri and How They Influenced European Fairies
Peri
This
mythical creature in what was once Persia (mainly Iran but also Afghanistan and
Pakistan) caught my eye.
Peri
roughly translates to ‘fairy’ and the mountains in which they were said to
inhabit was called Peristan (‘land of the fairies’, the ‘-stan’ suffix means ‘land’).
They look like how we envision fairies today: small, delicate, and winged. Indeed,
it is from the peri that Europe/North America got its predominant idea of fairy
physiology. Even if fairies don’t all shimmer with the colours of the rainbow…
In Zoroastrian
myth, peri were the forces of good constantly at war with the daeva, the forces
of evil. The daeva often locked peri in iron cages at the top of trees. They
were sustained by the perfume of other peri who fly by the cages. Come Islam,
peri were considered to be the Fallen Angels who the Prophet Muhammad successfully
converted them to Islam.
Fairy
So if peri
changed how fairies looked, how did fairies look to begin with?
Rather boring
in comparison. ‘Fairy’ was once a catch-all phrase for magical creatures with a
human-like appearance and usually the size of toddlers; particularly in Celtic
areas (think Great Britain and Ireland), they were also termed ‘elves’ after
contact with Germanic creatures of similar appearance.
They lived
for centuries. Going to their world through burrows or fairy rings was
inadvisable: if you ate food there, you’d never leave; if you did return to
Earth, a century could have passed. Iron hurt them. Some would help with
housework (if offerings were left for them); others were more god-like in
character and depiction. Those in the Seelie Court (benevolent) played harmless
pranks on people when not helping them. Those in the Unseelie Court
(malevolent) harmed humans for fun and often kept humans as ‘pets’.
Perhaps the
most pressing issue about fairies in the mediaeval ages was the issue of
changlings. When a fairy got tired of looking after their elders, they’d swap
the elder with a human baby. The baby would be raised as a fairy, giving them
new blood for their gene pool; the fairy elder would be raised as a human where
their every need was taken care of forever.
The Outcome
Fairies were
once these powerful beings yet when they got depicted more like peri (who were
themselves immense creatures), their pretty, ‘feminine’ looks demoted them to being
weak and helpless. The patriarchy demotes two for the price of one.
Friday, 6 April 2012
Critique: Horton Hears a Who
Horton Hears a Who really fails to demonstrate elephant intelligence.
To be lighter than a feather, he breathes in a lot of air. Air may be lighter than a feather, but if he inspires it, he's only adding to the weight, thus he is becoming heavier than a feather, even more so than before.
Vlad drops the picked clover into a massive field of unpicked clovers. When Horton goes looking, instead of looking for the only picked clover, he picks all the unpicked clovers. Stupid!
To be lighter than a feather, he breathes in a lot of air. Air may be lighter than a feather, but if he inspires it, he's only adding to the weight, thus he is becoming heavier than a feather, even more so than before.
Vlad drops the picked clover into a massive field of unpicked clovers. When Horton goes looking, instead of looking for the only picked clover, he picks all the unpicked clovers. Stupid!
Thursday, 16 February 2012
Blobfish
Have you ever seen a picture of a blobfish?
On land, they're lumps of jelly with droopy noses and an aura of misery. Most fish on land, I suppose, would be miserable, but blobfish look truly distraught.
In water, they have shape just like any other fish. They live right at the bottom of the oceans around Australia. Their jelly-like bodies help them survive the intense pressures they experience at those depths.
Deep-sea fishing for crustaceans and other deep-living creatures means that the adorable blobfish are becoming extinct.
On land, they're lumps of jelly with droopy noses and an aura of misery. Most fish on land, I suppose, would be miserable, but blobfish look truly distraught.
In water, they have shape just like any other fish. They live right at the bottom of the oceans around Australia. Their jelly-like bodies help them survive the intense pressures they experience at those depths.
Deep-sea fishing for crustaceans and other deep-living creatures means that the adorable blobfish are becoming extinct.
Sunday, 22 January 2012
From God to Goats
I just
watched the Playing God episode of Horizon on iPlayer and it was quite
interesting. A few things were, well, wrong, but not severely so. These criticisms
are based on religion and genetics.
Religion
First off,
'Playing God'? God, as in the monotheistic omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient
and omnibenevolent being? Not really.
He
(or She, God is in fact agendered but as humans are patriarchal God is always
depicted as a He) created everything. This includes creating good and, because
good can only exist with its opposite of evil, creating evil.
To
play God, humans would have to create everything. This is, however,
problematic. God, from a religious standpoint, has already created everything
so there is nothing more for humans to create.
This
may be disproved with 'God didn't create cars', but the metals, plastics and
other car-things (I wouldn't have a clue) are made out of elements, which are
natural. Humans just assembled them differently. So in this episode of Horizon
the people were merely assembling life in different orders.
Thus,
'Playing God' is an inaccurate title, but I suppose 'Assembling Life in
Different Orders' would have been a tad too long.
Genetics
The
'spider-goat' and the diesel-producing yeast were fascinating. The problem was
that the programme claimed that it wasn't possible to produce these naturally.
Admittedly it’s very unlikely and probably wouldn’t happen but likelihood, probability, is not the same as
possibility.
With
genetic engineering, they managed to produce a goat to produce spider silk in
its milk. (The applications of spider silk production are fascinating.) Now,
spider silk is a protein and goat milk is full of protein. With a mutation, it
would be easy to have a spider-silk-like protein within goats’ milk. Admittedly
this would hold no advantage to a goat so if it did acquire this mutation, it
would most likely fade from the gene pool.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)